Institutional Trust & Capital Accountability

The governance infrastructure
for trustworthy AI

TTIC is the independent strategic intelligence and decision infrastructure for boards and C-suite leaders governing consequential AI, and for the investors who fund it. We provide the foresight, evidence, standards, and decision architecture that give accountable leaders clarity to exercise their own authority.

Effective AI governance is where clinical value and financial value converge. For medtech, that means margin lift and expansion. For health systems, it means balance sheet protection, stronger insurance underwriting, and bond rating defense. AI capability only delivers on valuation when governance infrastructure is built to earn and hold trust · at the bedside and on the balance sheet.

ANSI
Standard Author
Hospital AI Operations
6+
Books Published
T&F · Springer · Artech
2025
AI Champion
AIMed Global Award
J&J
Alumni
A dozen disease areas
As covered in
Techstrong.ai
"We are right on the cusp of a lightning rod issue with the intersection of AI and healthcare transformation."
Sherri Douville, Founder & Chair TTIC & CEO Medigram ↗
Becker's Hospital Review
"Setting global standards for AI governance, and why trust and economic impact are critical to the future of healthcare technology."
Scott Becker with Sherri Douville ↗
Chair’s Note  ·  Sherri Douville
Dear Reader,
how to use this site
A note from the Chair  ·  Sherri Douville

If you lead a health system north of $4 billion, own the P&L for a medtech business whose customers are the people named in this letter, sit on the board of one of these health systems or their strategic medtech partners, govern player health for a professional sports organization, allocate capital inside these institutions as a finance leader, or conduct diligence on the companies that serve them, this site is built for you. You are the person who signs off when something goes wrong, whose name appears on the bond covenant, the contract clause, the board minute, and the investment memo.

Definition

About TTIC

TTIC is the independent strategic intelligence and decision infrastructure for boards and C-suite leaders governing consequential AI, and for the investors who fund it. We provide the foresight, evidence, standards, and decision architecture that give accountable leaders clarity to exercise their own authority. TTIC brings together practitioners and investors across medicine, cybersecurity, engineering, standards, law, operations, and finance.

About TTIC

Building the control layer
for high-risk AI

TTIC is the independent strategic intelligence and decision infrastructure for boards and C-suite leaders governing consequential AI, and for the investors who fund it. We exist to solve a problem most investors and health systems now recognize: AI scales faster than governance.

Most health systems are not waiting for permission to deploy AI. They are already living with the consequences of having deployed it. The operational and cultural challenge is not knowing what the right thing to do is. It is having the unambiguous, defensible framework to actually do it. TTIC’s role is to make the “what to do” clear, credentialed, and actionable under adversarial conditions.

Our cross-standard execution model integrates IEEE/UL 2933, the OWASP GenAI Security framework, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001. We don’t translate standards. We operationalize them.

Co-founded by Sherri Douville and Mitch Parker, TTIC convenes the practitioners and executives who cannot afford to get it wrong.

Why Move
The Cost of Inaction Is Irreversible
AI adverse events don’t give second chances. Board liability, bond rating exposure, and patient harm don’t wait for governance to catch up. The organizations that act now set the standard. The ones that wait inherit someone else’s crisis.
Why This Journey
Standards Built Before the Market Required Them
TTIC co-authored IEEE/UL 2933 (TIPPSS) and the ANSI Hospital AI Operations Standard before governance was a boardroom word. Six books. A decade of coalition-building. The infrastructure existed before the demand did, which is why it holds when others improvise.
Why TTIC
The Combination That Cannot Be Replicated
We write the standards. We build to them by example. We deploy them across every function required to govern, build, deploy, implement, integrate, and maintain AI across the full lifecycle. Cited and incorporated by CHIME in their AI principles. Cited in medtech contract language reaching 400+ healthcare organizations through the HSCC framework. In this combination, we stand alone.
Next Step
Where the Stakes Match Your Standard
TTIC convenes the operators, clinicians, technologists, and executives who can’t afford to get it wrong. Membership is by introduction only. Most organizations haven’t yet built the structural accountability or aligned the incentives this work requires, which inverts ROI when that calculus is wrong.
Differentiation

Trust fails between disciplines.

Health systems already have physicians on staff. They already have engineers, cybersecurity leaders, and lawyers. Expertise inside each discipline was never the gap.

The gap sits at the seams: the points where a clinical requirement has to become an engineering specification, where an engineering control has to become a cybersecurity control, where a cybersecurity finding has to become a governance obligation a board can act on. TTIC was built to own the seams between disciplines. A seam is the point where a requirement, a decision, or a piece of evidence has to cross from one discipline into another without getting lost, delayed, or reinterpreted.

A single AI deployment decision crosses six of these seams on its way from idea to accountable operation:

  1. Medicine
  2. Research
  3. Engineering
  4. Cybersecurity
  5. Law & Governance
  6. Executive Operations

TTIC integrates the requirements, evidence, dependencies, handoffs, and accountability that move a decision through every seam in that chain. That integration work, not the roster of disciplines represented, is what distinguishes the consortium.

TTIC’s membership network is organized around the institutional functions required to staff that chain. See how the network is structured →

The same chain repeats at the level of standards, from a published standard to institutional practice. See how TTIC closes that gap →

Why does trustworthy AI require multiple disciplines? →

Core Values

Guided by AI ICE

The behavioral and operational compass ensuring AI is deployed responsibly, ethically, and for the greater good of patients and providers.

Standards Work

Where TTIC writes the rules

TTIC leadership holds authorship and co-chair positions across the standards governing AI deployment in healthcare · not as commentators, but as architects.

ANSI/HSI 2800:2025 · Approved Dec 17, 2025
Healthcare AI Governance
in Operations
ANSI-Accredited Hospital Operations Standard
Standard Author & Convening Body · TTIC. Translates engineering-layer AI safety into executive-level governance accountability. Covers AI deployment lifecycle, oversight, risk frameworks, and organizational accountability. WG Chair: Hamed Abbaszadegan, HSI. Purchase on ANSI Webstore ↗
IEEE · Active
IEEE/UL 2933 TIPPSS
Trust, Identity, Privacy, Protection, Safety & Security
Overall WG Chair: Florence Hudson. Vice Chair: Mitch Parker. Co-Chair, Trust and Identity Subgroup: Sherri Douville. Cited and incorporated by CHIME in their AI principles ↗. The foundational engineering-layer framework for trustworthy AI in clinical IoT and connected health. Purchase Standard ↗ IEEE/UL 2933 TIPPSS evidence and primary sources →
Cross-Standard · Operational
Multi-Standard Execution Model
Integrated Deployment Architecture
Integrates IEEE/UL 2933, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001 with the OWASP GenAI Security framework ↗ · turning policy into executable controls across the full AI deployment lifecycle.
EARLY ACCESS CERTIFICATION · ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
TTIC Certification: Agentic AI Enforcement Requirements
This certification program is in early access and is not yet open for general enrollment.

The Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (January 2026) identifies resource management and operational boundaries as a governance concern in agentic AI systems. No major governance frameworks currently specify technical mitigations for resource exhaustion and token-level attacks as a required control.

TTIC's early access certification requires demonstrated enforced controls for resource exhaustion as a Tier 1 requirement, consistent with the OWASP Agentic AI Security guidance. Certification candidates must show that rate limiting and token-level boundaries are enforced as blocking rules, not advisory policies.

TTIC Position
Accountability · Commitment · Integrity
Why TTIC focuses on ANSI-accredited standards

Click the card to understand why accreditation is not a formality. it is the difference between a governance framework that holds and one that doesn't.

Why TTIC focuses on ANSI-accredited standards
TRUST
Accreditation is not a credential. It is a process guarantee. the same one physicians already trust in every institution that trained them.
↕ Tap to see why it matters
The Case for Accredited Standards
ANSI accreditation is the same trust infrastructure physicians already rely on, applied to technology governance.
Legal & Liability
Bond counsel are advising CFOs to include AI integrity clauses in 2026 annual reports. Moody's now looks for model traceability and auditable human-in-the-loop documentation as part of M&G scoring. When governance is questioned, the process behind an ANSI-accredited standard is the defense that holds.
Bond Rating & Financial
Rating agencies are beginning to ask health systems about AI governance frameworks as part of credit reviews. An ANSI-accredited standard is the documented, defensible answer. An AI adverse event without one is a financial risk event, not just a clinical one.
The Physician Parallel
LCME accredits medical schools. ACGME accredits residency programs. ABMS governs board certification. Each works because the process is rigorous, consensus-based, and carries institutional weight. ANSI does the same for technology governance, and physicians already know exactly what that means.
↑ Flip back
The Field Record

What the consortium has built, verified, convened, and been recognized for

Featured Coverage · August 2026
Community Spotlight: The CISO Is the Defensive Captain Now, featuring Sherri Douville and Medigram's Darwin deployment

Image: Open Agent and AI Security Community, August 2026.

Featured by the Open Agent and AI Security Community, August 10, 2026.
Community Spotlight: The CISO Is the Defensive Captain Now
The community's spotlight on TTIC's “CISO Is the Defensive Captain” piece describes Medigram’s Darwin deployment as having “posted the highest Praxen behavioral score recorded to date.”
“Configuration has stopped predicting behavior.”
Sherri Douville, Founder & Chair, TTIC
Read the community spotlight ↗
2026 Focus

Governance through SLOs

Service Level Objectives (SLOs) are not technical metrics. They are executive-grade control mechanisms that give CIOs, CISOs, CMIOs, CFOs, and boards a shared language for measuring AI accountability in real time. Click any card · or watch them turn.

Most health systems are already past the point of careful planning. AI is in production. The question is no longer whether to govern it. It is how to govern it now, with what you have, in real time.

CIO
How do I know my AI systems are actually performing to the standard I promised the board?
↓ See the answer
SLO Answer · CIO
SLOs give you real-time thresholds tied to clinical workflow reliability · not vanity metrics. You see breach before the board does.
Uptime SLO · AI Decision Latency · Audit Trail Completeness
↑ Flip back
CISO
How do I quantify AI security posture in terms my CFO and board will actually act on?
↓ See the answer
SLO Answer · CISO
SLOs translate attack surface exposure into operational thresholds · a breach of the security SLO triggers governance response, not just a ticket.
Model Integrity SLO · Access Control Compliance · Incident Response Time
↑ Flip back
CMIO
How do I ensure AI recommendations stay within clinically acceptable bounds without slowing care?
↓ See the answer
SLO Answer · CMIO
Clinical SLOs set explicit boundaries for AI behavior in care pathways · physician judgment stays primary, and deviation from the SLO triggers human review.
Clinical Override Rate · Algorithmic Drift · Patient Safety Signal Latency
↑ Flip back
CFO
How does AI governance protect our bond rating and insurance underwriting position?
↓ See the answer
SLO Answer · CFO
Moody's and S&P are now treating AI governance as a credit factor. SLOs give you audit trails and human-in-the-loop documentation · the accountability record that moves you ahead of the requirement.
Governance Coverage % · Compliance Continuity · Audit Readiness Score
↑ Flip back
Board
What do we actually own and control in our AI program, and what is our fiduciary exposure?
↓ See the answer
SLO Answer · Board
SLOs make AI accountability a board-visible metric. When an SLO is met, governance is working. When it is breached, the board has the evidence to act · before oversight bodies do.
D&O Exposure Indicators · Governance Alignment · Fiduciary Evidence Chain
↑ Flip back
Founding Team

Built for Those Who Save Lives
With Accountability to Boards, Oversight, and Capital

TTIC’s founders and team write the standards, build to them by example, and deploy them across every function required to govern, build, deploy, implement, integrate, and maintain AI across the full lifecycle. In this combination, we stand alone.

About TTIC · Publication Provenance

TTIC originated from a Taylor & Francis-commissioned book series and continues to publish practitioner-grade resources used in ANSI-accredited standard review cycles. Taylor & Francis is one of the world’s leading academic publishers, with a portfolio spanning medicine, engineering, and social science.

Our focus is on operationalizing the Taylor & Francis AI policy framework into multidisciplinary books that meet the practical challenges and opportunities of the AI era, resources designed for the executives, clinicians, technologists, and standards authors who have to make governance work under real-world conditions.

Co-Founders
Founder & Chair, TTIC
Founder & Chair, TTIC  ·  CEO, Medigram  ·  Co-Chair, Trust and Identity Subgroup for IEEE/UL 2933
TTIC · Medigram · IEEE · AIMed Advisory Board · J&J Alumni

Series editor at Taylor & Francis. Led the TTIC contribution to the authorship of ANSI/HSI 2800:2025. AIMed Advisory Board. Combined Sciences, Santa Clara University. MIT AI/ML coursework. Johnson & Johnson alumni spanning a dozen disease areas. Former Series 7 and Series 66 licensed · uniquely tying clinical impact to technical architecture, and bond ratings to underwriting and financial impact.

Standards ArchitectureGovernancePublishingCapital Markets
Co-Founder
Co-Founder, TTIC  ·  CISO, IU Health  ·  Vice Chair, IEEE/UL 2933
TTIC · Indiana University Health · IEEE

Converts cybersecurity and technical strategy into operational metrics, driving the operational foundation that data and AI require for long-term success. Mitch helped drive the work at IU Health referenced by CHIME as a role model for third-party AI governance · the standard that anchors TTIC’s framework. Pushes the leading edge of efficiency and productivity in cybersecurity and AI at the institution, regional, and industry level.

CybersecurityIEEE StandardsHealth Systems
Leadership Team
Executive  ·  Operational  ·  Clinical  ·  Legal  ·  Finance  ·  MedTech  ·  Architecture
MD, MPH  ·  Chair, Clinical Excellence
TTIC · Medigram

Co-designer of Extended Biodesign for AI. The practicing physician voice in TTIC’s standards work, bridging clinical practice and governance.

Clinical ExcellenceBiodesignAI Ethics
CISO, ChristianaCare  ·  Chair, Healthcare Cybersecurity & Resilience
TTIC

Industry leader in healthcare cybersecurity and organizational resilience, bringing operational depth and strategic expertise to TTIC’s governance framework.

CybersecurityHealthcare ResilienceGovernance
Chair, Compliance  ·  CEO, Censinet
Censinet · TTIC

Chairs TTIC’s compliance domain. Pioneering healthcare cybersecurity risk management and AI security at enterprise scale.

ComplianceCyber RiskAI Security
Chair, Clinical Integration  ·  CMO, Medigram
Medigram · TTIC

Leads TTIC’s clinical integration domain. Drives the translation of governance standards into practical clinical workflows and deployment readiness.

Clinical IntegrationCMODeployment
Executive Sponsor  ·  CIO, Renown Health
Renown Health · TTIC

Executive sponsor bringing the health system CIO perspective · operational accountability for AI governance at a major regional health system.

CIOHealth SystemsExecutive Governance
Chair, AI Security  ·  Chief AI & Product Officer, Exabeam  ·  Founder & Chair, OWASP GenAI
Exabeam · OWASP GenAI Project · TTIC

Chairs TTIC’s AI security domain. Founded the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications. Author of O’Reilly's award-winning The Developer's Playbook for Large Language Model Security.

AI SecurityOWASPLLM Risk
Chair, IT Strategy  ·  CHCIO, Santa Clara County Health
Santa Clara County Health System · TTIC

Chief Healthcare Information Technology Officer at Santa Clara County Health System. Partnering with TTIC Chair to adapt the Taylor & Francis AI policy framework to publishing and AI in IT.

Health ITAI PolicyIT Strategy
Publishing Sponsor & Coach  ·  CEO, Marx Advisory
Marx Advisory · Taylor & Francis · TTIC

Series Editor at Taylor & Francis and CEO of Marx Advisory. Former CIO of Cleveland Clinic, serial health system board director, and bestselling healthcare author. Publishing sponsor and coach to TTIC’s book series, bringing a legacy of enterprise leadership to our governance infrastructure work.

PublishingHealth IT LeadershipBoard DirectorT&F Series Editor
Venture Finance Advisory  ·  Managing Partner, TCBONDI CPA, INC.
TCBONDI CPA, INC. · TTIC

Brings venture finance and capital markets expertise to TTIC's governance work. Managing Partner of TCBONDI CPA, INC., advising healthcare and life sciences organizations on financial strategy, investment readiness, and fiscal accountability in AI deployment.

Venture FinanceCapital MarketsLife Sciences
IP & Legal Advisory  ·  Chair, MedTech Practice, Buchalter
Buchalter · TTIC

Brings IP and legal expertise to TTIC's governance infrastructure. Chair of the MedTech Practice at Buchalter, advising healthcare and life sciences organizations on intellectual property, governance strategy, and legal accountability in AI and medical technology deployment.

IP & LegalMedTechGovernance Strategy
Communications, Policy, Community, Foundations, Venture Capital, Life Sciences & Experts
Chair: Anthony Lee, Founder, Heroic Voice Academy  ·  Expert  ·  Policy Chair: Mari Savickis
Chair, Communications, Community & Experts  ·  Founder, Heroic Voice Academy
Heroic Voice Academy · TTIC

Expert in leadership communications and high-stakes presentations. UC Berkeley and Duke MBA. Brings 18 years of technology startup experience and 16 years of event production to TTIC’s communications and community mission.

Executive CommunicationsHigh-Stakes PresentationsCommunity
Chair, Public Policy  ·  VP, Public Policy, CHIME
CHIME · TTIC

In an industry where healthcare finance and patient care are inseparable from federal and technology policy, Mari keeps the TTIC leadership team grounded in up-to-the-minute Washington D.C. realities impacting patients, clinicians, and hospitals.

Public PolicyFederal Health ITCHIME
Chair, Pro Sports Technology  ·  COO, Somnology
Somnology · TTIC

Chairs TTIC’s professional sports technology domain, applying health AI governance frameworks to elite athletic performance and sports medicine contexts.

Sports TechHealth AICommunity
VP Engineering, TTIC  ·  CEO, AppFaktors
AppFaktors · TTIC

Brings enterprise IT experience and back-end engineering leadership to harden and scale TTIC deployments. CEO of AppFaktors, with growing depth in healthcare AI infrastructure.

EngineeringPlatformCommunity Tech
Patient & Family Advocate  ·  CEO, Grape.ag  ·  49er Foundation Board  ·  SCU Trustee
Grape.ag · 49er Foundation · Santa Clara University · TTIC

As a patient and family advocate and patient family board member, Kristi advocates for well-governed, secure, and efficient deployment and integration of AI to drive the transformation of healthcare. In addition to the patient and family voice, she brings substantial leadership and experience in entrepreneurial AI and the impact that foundations have on higher education and healthcare.

Patient AdvocacyEntrepreneurial AIFoundationsHigher Education
WG Chair, ANSI/HSI 2800:2025  ·  Physician Executive, Stanson Health
TTIC

Chaired the ANSI/HSI 2800:2025 working group, bringing clinical AI deployment experience from Stanson Health to TTIC’s standards operationalization work.

Clinical AIStandards AuthorshipPhysician
Venture & Life Sciences  ·  Board Director & VC
TTIC

Seasoned venture capitalist and board director with deep expertise in life sciences and healthcare innovation. Brings investor-grade rigor and board-level governance insight to TTIC's mission of trustworthy AI deployment across clinical and life sciences contexts.

Venture CapitalLife SciencesBoard Governance
Governance Standards Evangelist  ·  Professional Speaker & Entrepreneur
TTIC

Translates complex AI governance and standards work into accessible narratives for broad healthcare audiences. Brings entrepreneurial energy and platform reach to advancing TTIC’s mission of trustworthy AI in healthcare.

Governance EvangelismHealthcare AISpeaker
Brand Ambassador
TTIC

Brand ambassador advancing TTIC’s presence and mission across the healthcare AI governance community.

BrandCommunityHealthcare
Brand Ambassador  ·  Co-Creator & Co-Host, Making Healthcare Work for You
TTIC · Making Healthcare Work for You

Brand ambassador and co-creator of the Making Healthcare Work for You show. Focused on human-centered healthcare solutions and bringing the patient and community voice to TTIC’s governance mission.

BrandPatient VoiceHuman-Centered Care
Publications

Six works that defined the field

Taylor & Francis, Springer, and Artech House. The Taylor & Francis titles by Sherri Douville directly informed ANSI-accredited standard review cycles.

Discussed on the SoundPractice podcast of the American Association for Physician Leadership

Advanced Health Technology, Adoption, and Integration with Brian D. McBeth, MD, CPE. American Association for Physician Leadership, SoundPractice podcast transcript, April 28, 2023.

In the guest's own words: “The book is important because it brings together experts from a wide variety of fields, the top minds in law, cybersecurity, risk, medicine, human capital, psychology, to name a few areas, to provide perspective, experience and knowledge that can guide leaders to implementing health tech systems that will foster partnership and collaboration between administration, tech departments and medical staff while mitigating institutional risk.”

Listen to the episode →
Recommended Reading · AI Security
The Developer's Playbook for Large Language Model Security
Steve Wilson, Chair of AI Security, TTIC  ·  O’Reilly Media, 2024  ·  Award-winning Cutting Edge Cybersecurity Book
Essential reading for your technical and security teams evaluating AI vendor stack risk and LLM deployment vulnerabilities.
View on O’Reilly ↗
Recognition

Awards & honors

Validation from the clinical, technical, and standards bodies whose recognition is hardest to earn.

Adoption

Standards at work

TTIC’s standards are embedded as governance infrastructure across two distinct tiers: the institutions setting the clinical standard of care, and the frameworks governing procurement across the industry.

Institutional Validation
AIMed · 2025
High Reliability AI
Governance Module
AIMed Global Summit · San Diego
TTIC convened and moderated a two-hour AI governance operating model session drawing speakers from Mayo Clinic, Stanford Biodesign, Roche, and Vanderbilt: the first of its kind at a major clinical AI conference. The institutions that set the standard of care validated TTIC’s governance framework in practice, not in principle.
IEEE/UL 2933 · MC2 · 2024
Medtech Cybersecurity
Contract Standard
HSCC Model Contract Language for Medtech Cybersecurity 2.0
IEEE/UL 2933 TIPPSS is cited in Clause 48 of the HSCC MC2 framework as a standard medtech suppliers must contractually attest compliance with, co-led by Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, and Premier, representing over 400 healthcare organizations. IEEE/UL 2933 is cited in medtech contract language reaching 400+ healthcare organizations through the HSCC framework. View MC2 ↗
AIMed · 2025
AI Champion Award
AIMed Global · Clinician-Led AI Recognition
TTIC and Medigram were recognized with the 2025 AIMed AI Champion Award, a clinician-led recognition from the organization whose membership includes the medical directors and CMIOs of the institutions TTIC serves. Awarded following the breakthrough governance module at AIMed ’25.
Industry-Wide Standards Adoption
CHIME · 2025
AI Principles Framework
College of Healthcare Information Management Executives
CHIME cited and incorporated IEEE/UL 2933 TIPPSS into their AI principles: health IT leadership’s formal alignment with the framework co-chaired by TTIC. Reaching 5,000 CIO members in 58 countries. View CHIME AI Principles ↗
Cross-Sector · Growing
OWASP GenAI Security Framework
Open Worldwide Application Security Project
TTIC team member Steve Wilson co-chairs the OWASP GenAI Security Project ↗ · the leading open framework for LLM and generative AI risk, downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and now informing enterprise AI security programs globally.
ANSI · Active
Hospital AI Operations
Standard
ANSI-Accredited Governance Standard for Health Systems
The only ANSI-accredited standard governing AI operations inside hospital environments, co-authored by TTIC. Covers the full governance lifecycle from procurement to deployment to post-market monitoring. The operational floor health systems build on when AI moves from pilot to production.
Leadership and Practice

From the TTIC Community

Original analysis, practitioner reflection, and leadership perspective on AI governance, standards implementation, and the disciplines required for responsible technology adoption in high-performance, high-reliability industries including healthcare, medtech, and pro sports. Posts are published here and on LinkedIn Articles depending on content type.

Featured Article · June 2026 New
Behavioral Verification Is Not Optional for High-Oversight Industries. Here Is Why TTIC Is Testing It as a Certification Requirement.
How TTIC evaluated Praxen, the open-source Agent Behavior Verification tool, on a governed clinical AI platform across three successive cycles. The result: a RAISE score of 4.0, the highest recorded to date. And why it now forms the foundation of the TTIC certification program.
Behavioral Verification AI Security RAISE Framework Certification
Read Article →
Practitioner Brief | AI Governance and Capital
Price Alone Does Not Establish AI and Agentic ROI
Two complementary executive instruments connect AI capital allocation to counterparty risk: one asks whether an investment is worth the capital it consumes, the other asks whether a counterparty is worth the institutional capacity it consumes.
AI Risk Stewardship GateAI Capital Decision GateInstitutional Capacity
Practitioner Brief | Finance
Healthcare AI Has Become a Capital Accountability Problem
What evidence should a CFO require before AI is funded, scaled, renewed, or stopped? A decision-gate framework for treating AI as a capital accountability problem, not a technology problem.
CFOCapital AccountabilityFinance Leadership
Investor Diligence | General Management
AI ROI and Patient Safety Are Starving for General Management
A company can contain excellent clinicians, engineers, security leaders, operators, financial executives, and commercial leaders while still lacking anyone capable of integrating the complete AI value chain.
Investor DiligenceGeneral ManagementAI Governance
Chair Letter · TTIC Blog
Someone Must Own the Seams
Trust does not emerge from a collection of excellent fragments. It becomes an institutional outcome only when someone is accountable for how those fragments work together.
Chair LetterTrustAccountability
AI Security & Governance · TTIC Blog
The CISO Is the Defensive Captain Now, Not the Defensive Coach
Configuration has stopped predicting behavior in agentic systems. Why the CISO's job has inverted from reviewing evidence to producing it personally.
CISOBehavioral VerificationAI Security
Episode art for The New CISO, Episode 150: The Player-Coach CISO: Engineering Trust in AI Agents with Open-Source Tools, courtesy of Exabeam
Podcast · The New CISO (Exabeam)
Why TTIC Exists: Standards Adoption and Trust on The New CISO, Exabeam’s podcast (Episode 150)
Sherri Douville on why TTIC was created, how it is separate by design from Medigram, and what it takes to move a standard into adoption in high-reliability industries.
IEEE/UL 2933Standards AdoptionTrust
AI Security & Governance · TTIC Blog
Safety Theater Is Not Patient Safety or Player Safety
A TTIC leadership perspective on agent governance: why clinical AI accountability requires more than guardrails after an agentic AI sandbox escape made headlines.
Agent GovernanceAgentic AIAccountability
Leadership Framework · TTIC
The Bar Has Moved: 10 Capabilities for Trustworthy AI Leadership by 2030
TTIC's practical framework for physicians, engineers, finance leaders, security leaders, operators, legal leaders, and executives building the capabilities required to turn AI expertise into defensible outcomes.
LeadershipCapabilitiesAI Governance
Leadership & Governance · TTIC Blog
Trustworthy Technology Requires Trustworthy Leadership
A TTIC leadership-development reflection on Scott Becker's Building Great Businesses. Trust as infrastructure. Discretion as a strategic capability.
LeadershipGovernanceScott Becker
Strategy · LinkedIn
The Future of Healthcare Is Sovereign and Competitive. Build Accordingly.
The institutions that will survive and thrive are building sovereign governance capacity now. The ones waiting for external conditions to stabilize are waiting for something that will not arrive.
SovereigntyGovernanceStrategy
Award Announcement · LinkedIn
TTIC and Medigram Honored with 2025 AI Champion Award at AIMed25 Following the Breakthrough Module Track
The full story behind the recognition and what it means for healthcare AI governance at enterprise scale.
AIMed25Award
Standards · LinkedIn
Agent-Ready With the New ANSI Hospital AI Operations Governance Standard
How the new ANSI standard positions health systems to safely adopt agentic AI · and what operational leaders need to do now.
ANSIAgentic AI
From the TTIC Network · LinkedIn
The CISO Hacked My Lobster
Steve Wilson, OWASP GenAI Project Founder and Chair, on what happens when a CISO turns adversarial AI testing into a field exercise. Red teaming agentic systems in the wild, and what standards bodies need to learn from it.
Red TeamingAI SecurityAgentic AI
Chair’s Notes
Connecting the Dots: Red Teaming and What Standards Bodies Must Learn
How Steve Wilson’s CISO red teaming article maps directly to IEEE/UL 2933, NIST CSF, and ISO 42001.
Have questions?
Read the TTIC FAQ · 2026 Edition
Answers to the most common questions about TTIC, its standards work, and how to engage.
Read the FAQ ↗
At the Frontier

From standards to execution. agentic AI governance in practice

Public Infrastructure

Openly Accessible

The standards and tools that govern healthcare AI are public infrastructure. The following resources are available to anyone without joining TTIC or engaging with the consortium.

Accredited Standard · Purchasable
IEEE/UL 2933
Sociotechnical Data Governance Architecture for Clinical IoT · TIPPSS
The foundational engineering-layer standard for trustworthy AI in clinical IoT and connected health. Purpose-built for healthcare. Co-authored by TTIC leadership.

Purchase on IEEE ↗
Accredited Standard · Purchasable
ANSI/HSI 2800:2025
Healthcare AI Governance in Operations · Approved December 2025
Translates engineering-layer AI safety into executive-level governance accountability. Covers AI deployment lifecycle, oversight, risk frameworks, and organizational accountability.

Purchase on ANSI ↗
Freely Available at No Cost
Open Framework · Free
OWASP GenAI Security Framework
Open Source · TTIC Co-Chair
The leading open framework for LLM and generative AI risk. TTIC's Steve Wilson co-chairs the project.

OWASP GenAI Project ↗
Open Source · Freely Available
Praxen · Agent Behavior Verification
Apache 2.0 · Released by Exabeam · TTIC Certification Layer 1
The open-source reference implementation for Agent Behavior Verification. Praxen's RAISE framework scores behavioral maturity across six categories: verifying that an AI agent's actual behavior matches its authorized governance remit before deployment and on an ongoing basis after.

Explore Praxen ↗  ·  Watch the launch video ↗
Field Notes · Free
TTIC Field Notes
Medium & LinkedIn · Open Access
Practitioner-grade analysis on AI governance and standards implementation, published openly by the TTIC network.

Medium ↗  ·  LinkedIn ↗
Adopted Standard · Free to Read
CHIME AI Principles
Health IT Leadership · IEEE/UL 2933 Incorporated
CHIME incorporated IEEE/UL 2933 TIPPSS as the foundational framework in their AI principles for health IT leadership.

CHIME AI Principles ↗
Investor Resources · Free
Investor Diligence
Requirements & Evidence Questions
Requirements and evidence questions for examining whether high-consequence technology claims can survive production, procurement, governance, and institutional accountability.

Explore Investor Diligence Resources ↗
CFO Instrument · Free
AI Capital Decision Gate
Fund, Scale, Renew, Remediate, or Stop
A one-page instrument for determining whether an AI investment has sufficient evidence, accountability, value, and risk controls to fund, scale, renew, remediate, or stop. Print-ready for board and investment committee review.

Open the Decision Gate ↗
Institutional Framework · Free
Seven Institutional Questions
Before Consequential AI Enters Production
The questions health-system executives, clinicians, boards, security leaders, and governance owners must answer before consequential AI enters or remains in production.

Explore the Seven Questions ↗
Leadership Framework · Free
The Bar Has Moved
10 Capabilities for Trustworthy AI Leadership by 2030
TTIC's practical framework for physicians, engineers, finance leaders, security leaders, operators, legal leaders, and executives building the capabilities required to turn AI expertise into defensible outcomes.

Explore the Framework ↗
Reference Architecture · Free
Verification, Validation & Evidence for AI
What “Validated” Actually Means
A scope-aware reference for CFOs, boards, and governance leaders: what a validation claim must specify, which parts of it TTIC defines, and where authority belongs elsewhere.

Explore the Reference Architecture ↗
The HIT Academy, Leading Healthcare Technology: A Field Manual for the Age of AI, by Khalid Turk
Education · Free
The HIT Academy
Healthcare Technology Leadership · Open Access
Khalid Turk's free course on leading healthcare technology through the age of AI. Lesson 27 directly addresses who owns AI governance inside a health system, essential for technical staff navigating clinical and operational accountability. The course bridges the gap between technical expertise and the business and governance context required for real institutional impact.

TheHIT.Academy ↗

Membership & Engagement

TTIC is a private consortium: not a nonprofit, not an association, not an open community. A by-invitation network of executives with real accountability in healthcare AI governance. If you are already a member, coordinate with your Leadership Team sponsor.

TTIC does not recruit. Members are identified through the work: standards authorship, institutional accountability, and demonstrated governance execution. There is no application process because there is no pipeline to manage.

The consortium is not a public good, and its network is not an open resource. It is a self-funded entity: founding members invest their reputations, networks, digital infrastructure, and personal capital, and the network it holds is the asset those investments built. We choose where to invest that asset, and we choose ethically: in part by who understands how to contribute to it and extend it. What we make public, we make public deliberately; our standards, books, and open resources are available to anyone.

Everything TTIC does is decided and inspired by what is right for patients and clinicians · not driven by policy and standards. Policy and standards are tools. Patient and clinician outcomes are the mission.

Stay connected
Follow TTIC on LinkedIn for governance insights, standards updates, and consortium news.
TTIC Follow us on LinkedIn ↗
Forthcoming books on AI & cybersecurity governance for boards and executives
TTIC · TRUSTWORTHY TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION CONSORTIUM
TTIC · TRUSTWORTHY TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION CONSORTIUM
TTIC · TRUSTWORTHY TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION CONSORTIUM
TTIC · TRUSTWORTHY TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION CONSORTIUM