Board Oversight
Resources from the Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium for board directors and trustees responsible for governance, material risk, accountability and evidence.
-
BRIEFING
Make AI oversight evidence-based. Boards do not need to operate AI systems. They do need enough evidence to determine whether management has built a...
-
ARTICLE
Accountability is only meaningful where it matches the authority to act. The explicit boundaries between what TTIC, institutions, investors, and companies each own.
-
ARTICLE
Organizations should require independent behavioral verification and normalized runtime telemetry before deploying consequential AI, not just a configuration attestation.
-
PAGE
Boards see the full institutional investment behind an AI decision: capital, plus capacity, plus expected downside, not just the purchase price.
-
BRIEFING
Assess whether AI risk is actually governed. AI changes institutional risk faster than many traditional questionnaires can capture.
-
PAGE
The questions health-system executives, clinicians, boards, security leaders, and governance owners must answer before consequential AI enters or remains in production.
-
ARTICLE
A standard defines what trustworthy AI requires. Governance operationalizes it inside an organization. Certification is the credential that lets a third party trust the result.
Governance & Risk · Finance & Capital · Executive Leadership · Cybersecurity
Choose TTIC as a preferred source in eligible Google experiences. Prefer TTIC in Google
- Published by
- Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC)
- Author
- By Sherri Douville, Founder & Chair, Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC)
- Originally published
- Last updated
Cite this resource
Sherri Douville. “Board Oversight.” Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC), 2026. https://trustworthytechnologyinnovation.com/responsibilities/board-oversight/.