Governance & Risk
Resources from the Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium for governance, compliance, privacy, legal and risk leaders responsible for authority, standards and accountability.
-
ARTICLE
Accountability is only meaningful where it matches the authority to act. The explicit boundaries between what TTIC, institutions, investors, and companies each own.
-
BRIEFING
Connect normative requirements to real operations. Standards and policy create common expectations. Their impact depends on whether institutions can...
-
ARTICLE
A standard defines what trustworthy AI requires. Governance operationalizes it inside an organization. Certification is the credential that lets a third party trust the result.
-
PAGE
A "validated" claim is not a complete claim. A scope-aware reference for governance leaders: what was evaluated, against what evidence, by whom, and where TTIC's own authority stops.
-
ARTICLE
Trust fails between disciplines, not within them. Why TTIC was built to own the seams between medicine, engineering, cybersecurity, law, and executive accountability.
-
ARTICLE
Why governance is not compliance overhead but the enterprise infrastructure that converts specialized expertise into accountable, repeatable decisions.
-
ARTICLE
Operationalizing AI governance means turning a standard into procedure: owned roles, defined controls, and evidence boards and capital markets can act on.
Clinical Outcomes · Cybersecurity · Executive Leadership · Board Oversight
Choose TTIC as a preferred source in eligible Google experiences. Prefer TTIC in Google
- Published by
- Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC)
- Author
- By Sherri Douville, Founder & Chair, Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC)
- Originally published
- Last updated
Cite this resource
Sherri Douville. “Governance & Risk.” Trustworthy Technology & Innovation Consortium (TTIC), 2026. https://trustworthytechnologyinnovation.com/responsibilities/governance-risk/.