Consortium Access

TTIC Members

This area is reserved for invited consortium members. If you have not received access credentials, contact your TTIC liaison.

Access denied. Please verify your credentials.

This pathway requires a separate access code. Your TTIC liaison will provide credentials when this pathway is assigned to you.

Access denied. Please verify your credentials.

Pathway access is assigned by role and mandate. If you believe you should have access, contact your TTIC liaison directly rather than requesting it here.

Consortium Members

Resources and Activation Pathways

Current documents are available below. Activation pathways are assigned by your TTIC liaison and require a separate access code for each.

Available Now

Current Documents

These documents are available to all consortium members. Download and review before your next engagement.

TTIC · External Brief

Why TTIC Is Essential: Technical Integrity and Execution in Healthcare AI Governance

One-page brief on TTIC's position in the governance landscape. Covers the relationship to CHAI, WHO, and CHIME, and why the execution gap requires independent technical infrastructure. Suitable for external distribution.

Download Brief

TTIC · Confidential Internal

Consortium Leadership Summary

Strategic landscape orientation for consortium members. Covers the governance architecture, the two-engine activation model, and the three-stage conversation sequence. Marked Confidential for Internal Use Only.

Download Summary

From the Chair · Sherri Douville

Dear Members,
on why we build to the highest standard

TTIC’s international policy position · March 2026

The most consequential medtech companies grow fastest outside the United States. The most consequential health systems above $4 billion are navigating AI governance across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. This is not a coincidence. It is a convergence, and it is why we are here.

If you are here to protect your balance sheet, your bond and credit ratings, and your patients, you are in the right place. TTIC members do not manage governance risk from a distance. We embrace it. We tackle it directly.

Political winds shift constantly. General purpose AI regulation is contested and will remain so. But high-risk medical AI operates under a different framework entirely. EU MDR is medical device regulation. It has been hardening for decades. It is not subject to the same volatility as the EU AI Act or any current deregulation conversation in the United States. When you build to EU MDR, you are not making a bet on European policy posture. You are building to a standard that has never moved in the direction of less accountability for patient safety, and there is no credible scenario in which it does.

What is decided in Singapore today is a shared supply chain risk tomorrow. Conflict threat surfaces are no longer contained by geography. The governance infrastructure you build inside your institution does not just protect your patients. It protects your position in every market where your technology or your partnerships operate.

One high-profile AI medical disaster in Europe or the United States will instantly reverse the current trend toward deregulation. The regulatory response will be faster and harder than anything preceding it. The institutions that built to the highest standard before that moment will not be scrambling. They will be the reference point.

By building to ISO 42001, IEEE/UL 2933, and full EU MDR compliance, you make your technology immune to political volatility. You are not passing a government audit. You are building a fundamentally stable, deterministic product that hospitals will actually trust, in any jurisdiction, under any regulatory condition.

That is what this consortium exists to make possible.

With Acknowledgement

This letter and the HTI-5 policy training available in the Physician Luminary and CMO/CMIO tracks were inspired by the work of Mari Savickis, Chair of the TTIC Policy Committee, and Dr. Apurv Gupta and Dr. Arthur Douville, Co-Chairs of TTIC Clinical Integration. Their contributions to this consortium’s understanding of the regulatory landscape are what make the training in your pathways worth trusting.

Sherri Douville

Founder and Chair, TTIC · CEO, Medigram
Co-Chair, Trust and Identity Subgroup, IEEE/UL 2933 · Series Editor, Taylor & Francis

Activation Pathways

Assigned by Role

Each pathway is scoped to a specific mandate. Access is assigned by your TTIC liaison when you are active on that track.

Pathway 01

Physician Luminary

Three-stage activation sequence, luminary type profiles, and exact language for institutional engagement. For clinical leaders being activated as Incentive or Adoption Drivers.

— Access Required

Pathway 02

Engineer / Implementer

TIPPSS technical architecture brief, implementation sequence, and audit checkpoint framework. For technical leaders with deployment accountability.

— In Development

Pathway 03

CMO / CMIO

Clinical governance brief, AI safety event reporting protocol, and physician activation playbook. For clinical leadership with operational oversight.

— In Development

Pathway 04

CFO

Balance sheet defense framing, bond covenant and D&O insurance connection, and governance infrastructure ROI. For financial leadership with P&L accountability.

— In Development

Pathway 05

Board Member

Fiduciary duty framing, liability exposure brief, and two questions every board member should ask management about AI governance.

— In Development

Pathway 06

Consortium Member

90-day activation sequence for consortium members. Builds on the Consortium Leadership Summary with structured milestones and checkpoints.

— In Development

Pathway 07

CISO

TIPPSS security and protection dimension integration, red teaming protocol alignment, and board reporting framework. For security leaders with governance accountability.

— In Development

Pathway 08

CIO

Operational AI governance infrastructure brief, TIPPSS documentation template, and governance committee charter. For technology leaders with program delivery accountability.

— In Development

Pathway 09

CNIO

Nursing AI governance brief, identity and privacy workflow protocol, and AI safety event reporting guide. For clinical informatics leaders activating nursing staff as Adoption Drivers.

— In Development

Pathway 10

CEO

Enterprise governance framing, competitive differentiation case, and board presentation template. For enterprise leaders positioning governance as balance sheet defense.

— In Development

Pathway 11

COO

Operational governance integration brief, workflow checkpoint template, and RUAIH compliance operationalization guide. For operational leaders embedding governance into workflows.

— In Development

Pathway 12

General Counsel

Legal governance brief, HSCC model contract language alignment, and liability exposure assessment. For legal leaders connecting standards to contract language and regulatory defense.

— In Development

Pathway 13

Chief Quality Officer

AI quality governance brief, safety event reporting integration guide, and TIPPSS-to-quality-framework mapping. For quality leaders operationalizing RUAIH AI safety event reporting mandates.

— In Development

Pathway 14

Investor

Governance risk brief, TIPPSS due diligence scan template, and TTIC landscape positioning. For investors evaluating AI governance infrastructure as a material risk factor. 30-day pathway.

— In Development

Pathway 15

MedTech General Manager

Strategic P&L governance brief, health system partnership accountability framework, and TIPPSS deployment readiness assessment. For medtech leaders with direct accountability for health system outcomes.

— In Development

Pathway 16

Pro Sports Player Health

AI governance brief for elite athlete health programs, performance data accountability framework, and TIPPSS application to high-stakes real-time decision environments. For executives governing player health AI.

— In Development